Posts
Post 028
There are two, and only two, theories of how life originated.
These two theories are as diametrically opposed as conceivably possible, which is the natural result of the nature of the two forces sponsoring each view.
The first and most accepted view by modern man, is the theory of Evolution. In a nutshell, this baseless, science-less theory suggests that all matter known in the entire universe, somehow began from nothing, and then from the most basic elements, is now the result of a series of many thousands of millions of minor biological successful accidents. Each purposeless accident made a slight improvement on the subject object resulting in the most complex forms present today beginning from the simplest elements.
This success was not just with a singular life form, but branched into the plethora of variations in life we see today, all varieties of plants, bugs, birds, fish, animals, germs, amoeba, etc. In other words; everything has gotten better and better over time.
So many amazing successful changes, I wonder if there is room in evolution for the occasional accident with an unfavorable result, or are all random accidents typically improvements in this theory?
Scientifically, there is not one known element in the entire known universe that left to itself becomes better over time. Fact; all observable matter is in the state of decay. Yet the theory of evolution defies all known scientific reality, and is so baseless it cannot even accurately be called a serious theory.
The opposing view, accepted by most of the men of recent past (those ignorant fools like our founding fathers), is the theory of Creation.
In a nutshell, this theory says God has always been, and is a force outside the constraints of our known space/time dimension. This God created from nothing everything that is, perfect from the beginning. Since then, things have progressively deteriorated over time.
This theory conforms to all known science, though there are elements that are still a mystery, they do not defy science.
Just as the re-awakening of Christianity in recent history gave light to bring back the “round earth” idea (3 laws of planetary motion, by Yohannes Kepler 1600s... who also wrote 2 books on the star of Bethlehem), and history today now thinks that was the first time that idea was developed, in spite of the fact that the bible over 3000 years ago already declared that (Psalm 19:1-6).
One day a Christian society will bring back the “Creator Theory” by scientific evidences and the world will think they invented the concept in their modern wisdom. They will look back on us and wonder how a people could be so ignorant of science as to believe in evolution, yet travel to the moon!
What am I saying?
That each generation has progressively gotten dumber over time, not smarter.
As in any trend, there are always minor forward and backward movements, but the overall progression is that of less intelligent not more so. The Greeks were performing brain surgery, the Egyptians built structures that we today have no idea how they accomplished it. Rome had sophisticated plumbing. Yet we always look back on those of the past as barbaric and ignorant.
Yes, there were cave men in the past, but no different than the Aborigines of Australia today, Mankind as a race was never in a “caveman phase” as a part of the evolutionary process of betterment. The first man was the most perfect man, each generation, like copies, have progressively degenerated little by little.
What we have in observable reality is Reverse Evolution.
This theory conforms to all science.
What does this mean to us today?
If you accept the idea that man is constantly evolving in a direction of improvement, you must do so with your imagination, because science does not support this idea.
If truth, history, logic, and science are not required to come to a line of thinking, then there is nothing to stand in the way of any form of insanity you choose to believe. The idea of evolution is so mathematically impossible that to believe it removes the word Impossible from the vocabulary. Webster’s dictionary definition should then read;
Impossible: An unused, archaic word of our ignorant ancestors, [describing a now rejected idea that] 1. Evidence could show that something could not occur. 2. The nature of reality demands limits and boundaries associated with all things, therefore something beyond that scope was once considered impossible.
Our Nation was once, not long ago, a wise, benevolent, wealthy, powerful, safe place to live. Through a dynamic departure from our National foundations, our nation has become a confused, greedy, corrupt, weak, selfish nation mocked by the other nations of the earth.
How we see the cause that got us here, and what must be done to fix the problem will depend on which of the two theories you believe.
* * * * * * *
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Next Step
Post 027
So what the heck does that last post have to do with politics?
Only everything.
The one thing Fox media will not talk about is the one thing that made America what it was, And is the only thing that can restore it.
That one thing is that as a nation, the people believed they were accountable to the Creator.
Our founders were convinced by reason that there is a God that created all things.
Our government today has gone to great lengths to abolish the notion of a creator from our places of education and the halls of our governing institutions. Our government has systematically removed God and all references to God from our history.
Is this just a religious argument?
No. If it was, you would still be reading in school George Washington's Fair well Address, un-edited, and many other writings of the founders.
It is understandable that one man may not like the religion of another, but the wholesale removal of the religion so entwined in government is to alter that government at it's foundation. To do it openly is a matter of thoughtful choice for it's subjects. To do it secretly is evil.
Every decision, every thought process must be calculated from one of two foundational perspectives;
1) We are responsible to our creator for what we do.
2) We are an accident responsible to nothing.
The first idea brought about the great success of the United States of America. The second idea is that which is bringing this great nation to it's end.
"Preposterous!" you say.
Then tell me, How do you determine what is right and what is wrong? Your answer will describe the cause of America's problems.
How do I know this?
The coin was either made, or it evolved. If you do not believe in a Creator who has given unalterable moral laws, then right and wrong must be subjective and therefore variable. Taken to it's end This thinking must conclude that there is no right and wrong.
To sustain a healthy society without moral laws is as insane a thought as Evolution.
* * * * * * *
So what the heck does that last post have to do with politics?
Only everything.
The one thing Fox media will not talk about is the one thing that made America what it was, And is the only thing that can restore it.
That one thing is that as a nation, the people believed they were accountable to the Creator.
Our founders were convinced by reason that there is a God that created all things.
Our government today has gone to great lengths to abolish the notion of a creator from our places of education and the halls of our governing institutions. Our government has systematically removed God and all references to God from our history.
Is this just a religious argument?
No. If it was, you would still be reading in school George Washington's Fair well Address, un-edited, and many other writings of the founders.
It is understandable that one man may not like the religion of another, but the wholesale removal of the religion so entwined in government is to alter that government at it's foundation. To do it openly is a matter of thoughtful choice for it's subjects. To do it secretly is evil.
Every decision, every thought process must be calculated from one of two foundational perspectives;
1) We are responsible to our creator for what we do.
2) We are an accident responsible to nothing.
The first idea brought about the great success of the United States of America. The second idea is that which is bringing this great nation to it's end.
"Preposterous!" you say.
Then tell me, How do you determine what is right and what is wrong? Your answer will describe the cause of America's problems.
How do I know this?
The coin was either made, or it evolved. If you do not believe in a Creator who has given unalterable moral laws, then right and wrong must be subjective and therefore variable. Taken to it's end This thinking must conclude that there is no right and wrong.
To sustain a healthy society without moral laws is as insane a thought as Evolution.
* * * * * * *
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Continued
Post 026
This next example goes just a bit further. Intentional deception is carefully organized and presented with the natural tendencies of the human mind calculated in for the desired perception.
This is my favorite example of seeing but not seeing!
Basketball pass test
(http://michaelscomments.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/very-interesting-test-of-perception/)
Think how much more can be done with actual lies!
"Half truth is often a greater lie" - Benjamin Franklin "Poor Richard's Almanack" 1758
This next deception is getting a bit more complicated to explain in a short blog, the following video uses professional media, appealing sound effects, and a voice narration that is accepted as scientific fact. But listen for these two points:
First: The number of times the concept words; Maybe, Perhaps, Possibly, Probably are used in this so-called scientific presentation. And Second: The presentation is built on a disprovable theory as if it was long proven to be fact. That theory? Evolution.
Common, stay with me for a minuet. Don’t get so defensive yet. After I am done you can still reject my views.
Before you watch the video on the cell, let me ask you; If I found an 1847 US quarter in the desert where it would seem impossible that man has been, would you believe that quarter had evolved there over millions of years? Or would you try to come up with another theory of how that quarter got there?
The evolution of that quarter would not even enter the equation. Of course the quarter was made by someone, and the theories of how it got there would get as wild as perhaps a collector of rare coins had dropped it out of an airplane.
Why would you so completely reject the concept that the coin had evolved? The coin is nothing more than a collection of metals in a circular shape with images stamped on both sides. It does not move, it is extremely simplistic, much more likely to have evolved than a cell.
But when it comes to biology we are told a fantastic story that simply defies all scientific evidence and observations; “Biology HAS evolved.” they say.
Now the truly strange part is that the entire theory of evolution is not based on facts that can be perceived in two different ways like the spinning girl example, but rather based on intentional lies and deception.
I ask just one simple yet foundational question;
“Give me just one example in all the matter of the known universe, using the laws of science, of anything that gets better over time when left to itself.” All things we know of is in the state of decay. This is the nature of biology. Yet in the face of this irrefutable fact, we are to believe that man has evolved from the primordial goo after thousands and millions of individual successful accidental improvements. Scientists have tried a very simple experiment;
"Put a living cell in beaker with the perfect solution to sustain the cell's life, then poke a hole in the cell with a sterile needle. The parts of the cell leak out into the solution. Why does the cell die?" - Michael Behe "Unlocking The Mysteries Of Life".
All the parts of the cell are already there in the form needed for life, no evolution needed at this point, the solution is perfect for life, no evolution needed at this point either, yet the cell cannot be brought to life with help let alone on its own. Yet we are to assume that by undirected accident and millions of years, evolution brought about the living cell, and the living cell brought about the variety of species we see today. This idea can be described as nothing short of insanity. Honestly.
Now watch the following video while thinking about this.
Cell Biology Deception
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zufaN_aetZI&feature=channel)
I am using reason and logic, I openly seek anyone who can show how my thinking to this point is flawed.
Notice how I have not brought religion or God into this until now, yet those of you who still believe in evolution have already jumped ahead with great emotional stress, to point out how unbelievable is the notion of God as a creator.
Your case does not defend evolution, just rejects the alternative theory which I never brought up yet. How do I know this? Because there is no other answer. The coin evolved or it was made.
And this is the reason why the belief in evolution; the rejection of God as creator. Not the science that proves evolution.
The theory of evolution is a card trick, a misdirection, a poorly thought out deception which only takes a bit of thought to realize it for what it is.
How does this relate to my previous posts?
Small bits of documentation will never prove a point. They can only be used to support a view already accepted. There is a bigger picture that is in question. If you follow my posts they will eventually point to the real issue.
All I ask is that you use your own mind, Reject all you think you know and start at the basics again, openly examining each concept with a fresh mind of discovery.
If your conclusion turns out to be the same, then fine, you’ve lost nothing. But you may just find that what you thought you knew might be a slick deception that will take you to our national destruction first, and your personal destruction next.
"Truth never lost ground by inquiry, because she is most of all reasonable" - William Penn "More Fruits of Solitude" 1702.
* * * * * * *
This next example goes just a bit further. Intentional deception is carefully organized and presented with the natural tendencies of the human mind calculated in for the desired perception.
This is my favorite example of seeing but not seeing!
Basketball pass test
(http://michaelscomments.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/very-interesting-test-of-perception/)
Think how much more can be done with actual lies!
"Half truth is often a greater lie" - Benjamin Franklin "Poor Richard's Almanack" 1758
This next deception is getting a bit more complicated to explain in a short blog, the following video uses professional media, appealing sound effects, and a voice narration that is accepted as scientific fact. But listen for these two points:
First: The number of times the concept words; Maybe, Perhaps, Possibly, Probably are used in this so-called scientific presentation. And Second: The presentation is built on a disprovable theory as if it was long proven to be fact. That theory? Evolution.
Common, stay with me for a minuet. Don’t get so defensive yet. After I am done you can still reject my views.
Before you watch the video on the cell, let me ask you; If I found an 1847 US quarter in the desert where it would seem impossible that man has been, would you believe that quarter had evolved there over millions of years? Or would you try to come up with another theory of how that quarter got there?
The evolution of that quarter would not even enter the equation. Of course the quarter was made by someone, and the theories of how it got there would get as wild as perhaps a collector of rare coins had dropped it out of an airplane.
Why would you so completely reject the concept that the coin had evolved? The coin is nothing more than a collection of metals in a circular shape with images stamped on both sides. It does not move, it is extremely simplistic, much more likely to have evolved than a cell.
But when it comes to biology we are told a fantastic story that simply defies all scientific evidence and observations; “Biology HAS evolved.” they say.
Now the truly strange part is that the entire theory of evolution is not based on facts that can be perceived in two different ways like the spinning girl example, but rather based on intentional lies and deception.
I ask just one simple yet foundational question;
“Give me just one example in all the matter of the known universe, using the laws of science, of anything that gets better over time when left to itself.” All things we know of is in the state of decay. This is the nature of biology. Yet in the face of this irrefutable fact, we are to believe that man has evolved from the primordial goo after thousands and millions of individual successful accidental improvements. Scientists have tried a very simple experiment;
"Put a living cell in beaker with the perfect solution to sustain the cell's life, then poke a hole in the cell with a sterile needle. The parts of the cell leak out into the solution. Why does the cell die?" - Michael Behe "Unlocking The Mysteries Of Life".
All the parts of the cell are already there in the form needed for life, no evolution needed at this point, the solution is perfect for life, no evolution needed at this point either, yet the cell cannot be brought to life with help let alone on its own. Yet we are to assume that by undirected accident and millions of years, evolution brought about the living cell, and the living cell brought about the variety of species we see today. This idea can be described as nothing short of insanity. Honestly.
Now watch the following video while thinking about this.
Cell Biology Deception
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zufaN_aetZI&feature=channel)
I am using reason and logic, I openly seek anyone who can show how my thinking to this point is flawed.
Notice how I have not brought religion or God into this until now, yet those of you who still believe in evolution have already jumped ahead with great emotional stress, to point out how unbelievable is the notion of God as a creator.
Your case does not defend evolution, just rejects the alternative theory which I never brought up yet. How do I know this? Because there is no other answer. The coin evolved or it was made.
And this is the reason why the belief in evolution; the rejection of God as creator. Not the science that proves evolution.
The theory of evolution is a card trick, a misdirection, a poorly thought out deception which only takes a bit of thought to realize it for what it is.
How does this relate to my previous posts?
Small bits of documentation will never prove a point. They can only be used to support a view already accepted. There is a bigger picture that is in question. If you follow my posts they will eventually point to the real issue.
All I ask is that you use your own mind, Reject all you think you know and start at the basics again, openly examining each concept with a fresh mind of discovery.
If your conclusion turns out to be the same, then fine, you’ve lost nothing. But you may just find that what you thought you knew might be a slick deception that will take you to our national destruction first, and your personal destruction next.
"Truth never lost ground by inquiry, because she is most of all reasonable" - William Penn "More Fruits of Solitude" 1702.
* * * * * * *
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)