Fair Daughters

Post 261
(Suggested re-reading: Genesis 6:1-7)

“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth…” Genesis 6:1a

Over-Population?
Right at the start of this passage we are told the unique global extinction came around the time mankind began to multiply across the entire planet, so is this passage evidence that the significant increase of population today is wrong, as our earth worshipers convince us today?
No not at all. In fact it was commanded as an intentional goal, both at the beginning (Genesis 1:28) and again after the flood (Genesis 9:1), and so we understand it is only noted here to further identify the timeframe at which these “other” events took place. “Over population” is a dramatic concern to the Godless because without a confidence that there is a creator who manages what he commands, this seems to be a very real and serious issue to resolve. We can’t fault them for their earnestness even though the result always ends in mass genocide at the hands of a few men. Remember the first plank of the Georgia Guidestones, in conflict with God’s command?

“1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” (*1)

Why is our population status important to the Genesis 6 event?
Remember that all scripture is given to us by the inspiration of God for our benefit of guidance through a number of specific methods (II Timothy 3:16), and that these scriptures in these ways are able to make us wise toward the result of salvation through the resulting faith in Christ Jesus (II Timothy 3:15). Therefore we must conclude that this is included in scripture to inform us of relevant events in a later time for our benefit. Curiously enough mankind is once again beginning to fill the earth to the degree that our volume is a serious concern to Godless men in leadership today. I submit that we must anticipate by this Old Testament warning identifying a population explosion of this magnitude, to be wary that some Type of the earlier events are also prone to occur when this happens. Remember we are speaking of Types and not exact repeats; Moses led God’s people through the desert to the Promised Land and by Type we understand that we today are also led through the desert to the promised land but in a completely “other” way though Typed perfectly. We do not automatically expect to find ourselves actually walking again in the dry sand of the Middle East because we are speaking of Types; of the identical thing perhaps in a completely different way but not necessarily. The population condition is a landmark to identify the when. Therefore we can reasonably conclude that we have now arrived at this general time period of "began to". Agreed?
With that said, we next see in the passage that daughters were born unto this growing population of men.
* * *

“…and daughters were born unto them,”… Genesis 6:1b

Really? (said with wry).
Clearly there is something here we are supposed to get or the statement would be ridiculously worthless; Of course men have daughters, it’s happened consistently for quite some time. But notice that the verse ends in a comma not a period;
* * *

Daughters and Demons:

…“That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose” Genesis 6:2.

The point being made is that at the time of this explosion of human population, for some unusual reason the sons of God (angels) took an overpowering interest in these daughters of men because they saw they were very appealing/beautiful…. SO appealing in fact, that they breached their “Do Not Cross” barrier and took whichever of them they wanted for their wives.
We know almost nothing of this age of old but what is written in scripture, but by this wording we can be sure that this was something never done before. We are further told plainly that this new thing was done in a period when the human population was beginning to fill the earth and the daughters of men were extremely appealing beyond normal. It doesn’t tell us the cause of this unusual appeal but we need to figure out what about these young women motivated this unprecedented conduct by the sons of God, because that might be something we can control. The fact that God chose to utterly destroy humanity from the face of the earth at this time, suggests this may be in our scope of responsibility and therefore accountability. The only way to know for sure is to discover the cause of this enchanting beautification.

The sons of God referenced specifically in this passage, are some of the fallen angels we now ignorantly refer to generically as demons (Job 38:7+Luke 10:18+Revelation 12:4 (remembering Job 38:7)+Job 2:1). This too generic interpretation, allowing further appropriate specification, was addressed in the previous post and is not in question by serious researchers that are not afraid to simply accept what is plainly and obviously declared by the Word of God… weird as it may seem. The fact that a third of the angels were cast (ballo) not fallen (naphal) from heaven is not questionable, scripture tells us this as a fact; Satan fell (pipto) from heaven (Luke 10:17-18) and cast (ballo) down with him those angels under his authority (Revelation 12:3-4), never described as fallen (naphal).
What does not come clear without further investigation is the nature of this descent from heaven. Jude 6 tells us, in the context of the Christian path becoming crooked (skolios), that the angels likewise scoliosed their own standing and were punished for it:

“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation (3613 oketerion), he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day” Jude 6.

So why did they leave their first estate and what did they do when they left? Jude continues:

“Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” Jude 7.

Jude is using the sin of Sodom and its surrounding area as a representation of the sin of the angels going after strange flesh by the means of unlawful sexuality; fornication, i.e. breeding with human women, to warn Christianity not to follow this pattern (physically or spiritually) but rather contend earnestly for the faith as it was originally given and not as it is prostituted today (Jude 3). This cannot be reasonably skewed to mean anything else! II Corinthians 5:1-3 confirms this interpretation of Jude and helps us comprehend that the habitation the angels left is the same house that we aspire to obtain:

“For we know that if our earthly house (3614 oikia) of this tabernacle (4636 skenos) were dissolved, we have a building (3619 oikodome) of God, an house (3614) not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house (3613 oiketerion) which is from heaven: If so be that being clothed we shall not be found naked. For we that are in this tabernacle (4636) do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life. Now he that hath wrought (2716 worked fully to accomplish) us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit. Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home (1736 endemeo) in the body (4983 soma), we are absent (1553 ekdemeo) from the Lord: (For we walk by faith, not by sight:) We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent (1553) from the body (4983), and to be present with the Lord” II Corinthians 5:1-8.

I really didn’t want to rabbit trail this in detail but it’s too important to the discussion. Our English words are too often quite generically inclusive and miss the very specific intent that the precise Greek language accommodated. Here are the original Greek meanings of the words used:

House 3614 oikia; from 3624; properly, residence (abstractly), but usually (concretely) an abode (literally or figuratively); by implication, a family (especially domestics):-- home, house (-hold).
Tabernacle 4636 skenos; from 4633; a hut or temporary residence, i.e. (figuratively) the human body (as the abode of the spirit):-- tabernacle.
Building 3619 oikodome; feminine (abstract) of a compound of 3624 and the base of 1430; architecture, i.e. (concretely) a structure; figuratively, confirmation:-- building, edify (-ication, -ing).
House/habitation 3613 oiketerion; neuter of a presumed derivative of 3611 (equivalent to 3612; a residence (literally or figuratively):-- habitation, house.
Home 1736 endemeo; from a compound of 1722 and 1218; to be in one’s own country, i.e. home (figuratively):-- be at home (present).
Body 4983 soma; from 4982; the body (as a sound whole), used in a very wide application, literally or figuratively:-- bodily, body, slave.
Absent 1553 ekdemeo; from a compound of 1537 and 1218; to emigrate, i.e. (figuratively) vacate or quit:-- be absent.

Between Jude and II Corinthians, we now comprehend that the angels left their eternal glorious bodies as perfectly complete in the presence of God where they belonged, to take up as temporary earthborn (mortal) bodies and live in the lust of the flesh among humanity and so be found shamefully “naked”. Rabbit-trailing only slightly further we now have a greater understanding of the “nakedness” of Adam and Eve who by rebellion against God’s command disrobed themselves through lust of the forbidden fruit, much as did the angels. This forbidden driving lust is played out in every teenager whose driving of hormones scream “sex now!”, but morality declares “Not until the proper time when all is complete in preparation for the purpose of sex”.
So we also see in this combination of passages that as Children of God we long to experience our perfect oiketerion in the presence of God “now” but morality says “Not until the proper time when all is complete in preparation for that house”.
There is far more to preparation than time but unfortunately most Christians, like the lusting teenager, just sits in preoccupation of self-longing, poutingly waiting until he’s “old enough” (raptured) rather that using that “waiting period” to get a job, learn a trade, become wiser and responsible, learning the maturity that it takes to provide for and maintain a happy healthy home. Likewise the teenage girl does not "waste her youth" on learning the domestic skills useful to helping a husband create a home of blessing and happiness but instead goes out dancing and partying, shopping and occupying all her time attending to the beautification of her carnal flesh mind and spirit.
God reserved those offending angels in everlasting chains under darkness and warns us that we too have just such a fate if we continue in the same earthborn way as they:

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men…” II Corinthians 5:10-11a.

Remember; the angels, already in heaven, left their place for self-focused lust, so do you suppose you will miss the punishment because “you are saved”, if you depart from sound faith for the same self-focused lust of the earthborn flesh and not rather attend the heavenborn spirit that you have been given if you are a Christian?

“For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment…The Lord knoweth how to…reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished: but chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness…” II Peter 2:4,9-10 (we will address this passage in detail later).

But before we move on, I am instructed by king David's response in II Samuel 1:10, to encourage those burdened by the knowledge of guilt that it is not yet too late for you! The messenger narrated his activities to king David like this:

"So I stood upon him (king Saul), and slew him, because I was sure that he could not live after that he was fallen (5307 naphal)..." II Samuel 1:10a.

King David responded like this:

“And David said unto him, How wast thou not afraid to stretch forth thine hand to destroy the LORD’s anointed? And David called one of the young men, and said, Go near, and fall upon him. And he smote him that he died” II Samuel 1:14-15.

I might be sure that America is nephil, and I might be describing that you yourself are naphal too, but God would treat me as David did the messenger if I slaughtered you with his scripture before you "died" on your own from your wounds. I am not "finishing you off" with my Blog but rather intending to show you the seriousness of your mortal wound so that you would earnestly seek the Great Physician Jesus Christ as if your life depended on it, because it does. Even more so now that we are once again arrived at the Days of Noah when "everyone" is not just fallen (naphal) but causing other to fall (nephil).

And now we have a new clue to the progression of our events of study as we see God’s proper design, not abandoned, but corrupted into this “strange flesh” lust. From our side of the responsibility it first begins among humanity before ending with demon participation. This concept of corrupting the glorious intent into a fallen (naphal) perspective is supported by the progressive chain-of-events fall into depravity described in Romans 1:17-32.
It would be a long rabbit trail to post here, but if you start with the last verse (32) declaring the known final judgment once this list of iniquity is full, then start backing up verse by verse, you begin to see that each preceding verse describes the iniquity that sponsored the one after. Sodomy is not found at the end of this passage but about in the middle, in otherwords Sodomy sponsors something after it, but is also itself sponsored by something before it. Knowing that the angels left their heavenly habitation to fornicate with the relationally strange flesh of humanity, we can understand that our Sodomy is what directly sponsored that event. Since Sodomy is now where we are again in world consideration of acceptable, we should evaluate what sponsors Sodomy. The previous verse (v.25) tells us it comes by changing the truth of God into a lie, and worshiping and serving what is created more that the One who created it (God). The Globalism, Mother Earth Environmentalism is just such a worshiping, not by replacing God but by changing the truth of God into a lie through Evolution, Eathworship, and the like.
There can be no doubt that humanity is now fully in this section of scripture speeding along toward the next phase. But neither can there be a doubt that we have not yet arrived at a problematic level of women breeding with demons producing children. We seem to be narrowing where we are located on this timeline of events, currently between Sodomy and Demonic children…. though now that you mention it~ (said half tongue in cheek).
* * *

Fair Daughters:
So why did the fallen angels find these daughters of men “fair” at this particular point in time; were women not desirably beautiful before then? I contend that they were not. I support this theory by the evidence of today’s average woman exceedingly more beautiful than the average woman less than 100 years ago; we have a plethora of photographic evidence for this claim and much older paintings of similar evidence. Further, today’s exceedingly beautiful women have the ease to maintain and enhance their desirability by: luxury of life and spare time, freedom and therefore less stress, education, financial prosperity, available high quality products, scientific and medical options, instruction in presentation, and development of demeanor, etc., while their predecessors were too busy keeping their families alive to develop these less useful qualities to that end. Yet like the many similar new attributes available to Olympians today, all this combined still does not answer the mystery of desirability that is just now exploding with unexplainable affect, even on our underage girls. “There must be something in the water” is an American phrase often used to make note that it’s mysterious but obvious. The question we must ask ourselves is Why is this condition of extreme feminine desirability occurring again in our day…when our population is also exploding…and Sodomy is becoming ever increasingly accepted as normal? Are we now preparing to repeat the ancient Type in some way? I wonder how much more enchanting our women need to become before they again enchant the angels themselves and motivate their involvement (Jude 6+13)? Am I saying we have arrived at that point? No, I still see plenty of room for further enhancement to that end if that is really where we intend to go, but I can’t ignore that we are going there quickly. I’m simply suggesting we pay intelligent attention to the trend by foreknowing the end result. Apparently our women can yet become even more goddess-like than they are now, but at the rate and stage of global population it doesn’t look like there is much time left to reach that sure end… unless mankind reduces that population by mass murder as planned and declared by “the Georgia Guidestones”, and many other such historical and planned documentable goals (*2).

I put forward the concept that there must be more to this mystery than a simple increase in our daughter’s desire to be beautiful in every way. This in itself is not wrong, as is supposed by backward religious orders today who seem to require their women to present themselves as ugly as humanly possible. It seems apparent that from their perception the scriptures unacceptably approve or support thoughts of sin in verses like (Genesis 29:17-18, Deuteronomy 21:10-11, I Samuel 16:12, I Samuel 25:3, Job 42:15, The Song of Solomon in many pointed places, Isaiah 4:2, Ezekiel 16:12-14, etc.) and God must be utterly despicable for his exploitation of Esther’s beauty (Esther 2:7+) etc.
No, I suggest that as gods (Psalm 82:6) we are actually supposed to increase our understanding of just what that means, both in our spirit and our flesh. The problem is that like those fair daughters of men in time past, our daughters are also capitalizing on the actual goddess status of their flesh (and I don’t mean just their physical body) while utterly ignoring their spirit, letting it develop or wither on its own. Let me attempt to explain it in another way;

A prostitute dresses herself in a way that draws attention to her flesh as a “product” for sale. Yet a refined moral woman of style also dresses herself glorifying her specific gender but without producing the same effect. Both “enhance” the presentation of the flesh but with very different results because of different motives. The different spirits of intent drives both the different end results, but does the prostitute consider her spirit as she enhances her desirability? No, and the end result is an enchantment to a specific kind of man with the intent to move him to the desired end. This woman is fleshly minded.
Today’s greatly desirable women, seemingly the counterpart of the prostitute, are not so grossly carnal though still strongly appealing to raw sexuality “with style and pheromones”, therefore this “refined” woman of intoxicating appeal is also fleshly minded. And she greatly appeals to the common self-proclaimed “good” man because of his own mind of flesh without the taste to the profane. Blame the woman/blame yourself and so we don’t judge her because we are willingly drawn to her enchantment to such a degree, and her “refined” presentation acceptably masks for society the appeal to fornication. Yet in contrast, there is a very beautiful woman, beautifully dressed, who for some reason does not create this sexual enchantment and so does not seem to fall into this category of earthly minded. I propose it is because she has enhanced her moral spirit in a greater degree than she has attended to her flesh. We must understand by scriptural warning that whatever our daughters are doing to enhance this “goddessness” without attending to God’s spirit, though greatly appealing to common and uncommon man is also appealing to…um… “other than mankind”, i.e. spirits. This appeal must be because of the godless spirit that grows by feeding the flesh and ignoring God’s spirit in the same way her physical charms appeals to our lusts. It’s not so much the skin on her but her carnal spirit that appeals, as “fair”, to the spirits, attention to her skin is simply the food that feeds her carnal spirit.
The Apostle Paul was not advocating women abandon the value and glory of their gender when he wrote I Timothy 2:9-11 but simply aligning the flesh specifically under the spirit in identifying which should get the preferred attention for the proper end result. I Peter 3:1-6 affirms this idea when he instructed godly women how to win their godless husbands by their godly nature not their flesh, but how many godless men are motivated to respond to a woman who dresses as if she has no dignity? The example Peter used as reference is Sara; Abraham’s wife, who, if you will remember, was a knockout! She was so beautiful in fact that Abraham was constantly afraid that kings of the land would take her from him (Genesis 12:11-12) and his fears were not unfounded (Genesis 12:14-15). Did he direct her to pull her hair back so tight it made her eyes close, rub dirt on her face and wear a camel’s hair dress like John the Baptist? No. My point is that hiding from the flesh is not spiritual but just hiding. Paul and Peter both were promoting the spirit not abandoning the flesh, though knowing that dressing the flesh is a woman’s natural gravitation they specifically listed a few boundaries to follow for comprehension that he really did mean a difference between dressing the spirit and dressing the flesh. We come in a package; we are also flesh as God pointed out and intended that our flesh would operate sexually (Genesis 1:28). But where these fair ladies went wrong is that they forgot that they were primarily spirit with a little skin on it.
It is my belief that this unbalanced mysterious goddess of the flesh could not happen without an equal and opposite corruption of the spirit and that both these factors were necessary for the angels to take action. They could not take the women without the corrupted spirit and they would not take them without the goddess of the flesh. The question we must ask ourselves is how does this Type play out in our lives today as we once again begin to cover the earth in population and our women are becoming a thing to behold and our desires are going where they don't belong?
* * *

Taking Wives:
The wording “took…of all which they chose” and the original definition of “wife” tells us quite plainly that these daughters were not intending that end and not necessarily willing or eager women wanting to be the wives of fallen angels (demons) but doesn’t deny that possibility either, it simply doesn’t matter to the end result. But it does mater to our humanity that finds itself in such a state, so let’s pause for moment to consider the mindframe of today’s girls and how it plays into this strange situation:

For a few decades now, we have random and sparse reports of Alien abduction and almost exclusively with them come descriptions of reproductive research and material harvesting. Ignoring the recognized large majority of hoaxes, there are simply too many well-documented cases to reject the concept outright. But without jumping off into that express-lane from which we would never return, let me switch this concept to a different angle:

Today, at least in America, there is an overwhelming trend of our young daughters hungering for dark romantic fantasies with vampires (*3). What is with that?! This is more than a bit strange, it seems out of character for girls… or is it?
It has long been a known mystery that “normal” young worldly girls tend to gravitate romantically toward “the bad boy” and many end up entangled with bad men. While eventually being battered and treated as dirt these woeful girls simply cannot leave their man but can’t endure the torment either. Vampires? That’s not such a big leap. The mystery is why they would want that in the first place. But why does anybody gravitate to self-destruction?
Now we return for a brief reminder of Beauty and the Beast where the girl disdains the handsome “manly man” attempting to woo her, and instead turns toward the monster that excites her passions even though he is presented to her as an actual ugly and dangerous Beast. Talk about your “bad man” story, it just doesn’t get any more obvious… or does it?

Quickly forgetting the romantically hopeful concept that the Beast is really just a lonely guy with a ruff exterior that “she can fix”, today’s girls are now openly seeking the bloodthirsty human-slaying monster himself just as The Little Mermaid was shown in song while the murderous cook prepared the corpses of her neighbors for her beloved prince to dine on. Let me introduce you to the next installment in the progressive chain of Princess stories:
* * *

Shrek:
It’s a “cute and harmless story” that is so far “out there” that it can’t possibly apply to reality. But extending the concept from Little Mermaid where her friend-eating lover was at least in the image of a man, through Beauty and the Beast where her lover isn’t in the image of a man but supposed to still be one inside somewhere if she can draw it out, we now find in Shrek that the beast is not really a man at all nor going to be a man with her help, but is actually a real Beast (with a likable though troubled personality at this stage in the progressions). Yet that is not the most troubling part of the story; what we find is that the girl who has been earnestly and hopefully waiting for her prince, though first confused, then appalled, then troubled, slowly discovers this Beast prince is OK and eventually looses her inner battle of hope, and becomes a monster just like her man!
How does this not trouble us deeply?! Especially as we now watch in real life our young daughters hunger for dark romantic vampire fantasies and hang out with boys filling that Type. When will anything actually trouble us to action? Is it just possible that in our day of population explosion, the confusion of Sodomy, and our exceptionally desirable goddess-minded daughters of the flesh, are actually physically, mentally, spiritually, and emotionally, ready for breeding with demons? Am I really all that whacked for asking this seriously? Remember these warning scriptures of this very thing are of the oldest records humanity has (Enoch 7th from Adam: Jude 1:14-16), and the accurate groundwork and foundation for a repeat is already well laid!
* * *

Grow Up Faster!

“The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years (80), yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away” Psalm 90:10.

Falling far, far short of the pre-flood 700-900 years, just how wise can we get in all our vast learning even with God striving on our behalf throughout our short lifespan? This is setting up to be a very bad circumstance!
Think about it, today we are used to children acting like children far too long, and send them away to college hoping that they will grow up enough by graduation to finally be ready to face the real world (I Corinthians 13:11). By the time they get out they are what, 21? Adam was 130 before he started to have children (Genesis 5:3) and once he was settled down to the maturity of adult family life he lived another 800 years (Genesis 5:4). And just to make sure we can actually believe what we think we read right, God does the math for us as a double-check (Genesis 5:5), yep; 930 years.
Now, you can choose to believe that or not, but it cannot be argued that the scriptures are somehow misinterpreted; God, in scripture, declared Adam lived 930 years, aided by God’s striving, and then died.
It also declared that now, after the flood, mankind will only live between 80 and 120 years with God’s striving aid. But although God said it was possible to live 120 years, most of us don’t make it past 80. If maturity starts at 21, where we actually begin to think about the law of consequences and how it applies to our life-choices, then that means we only have about 59 years to figure it out before we stand in the judgment to give account (Hebrews 9:27). It appears that a long life has more advantage than we now imagine.

OK, Moving on:
* * * * * * *

*1 Georgia Guidestones: Post 153 Corruption Part 2 (http://when-did-reason-die.blogspot.com/2011/01/corruption-part-2.html)
Guidestones as they stand (http://thegeorgiaguidestones.com/as_they_stand.htm), a Guidestone web page worth reading for it’s clear intent. Note Plank 2, which we will eventually get to in this study, as it has HUGE hidden meaning in ways you are just now beginning to see: “2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.”

(*2) The Documentable Plan to Slaughter Millions: [added 4/3/2013]
This persistent plank in the secular illusion to building a peaceful society is discovered woven into a myriad of endeavors through time.

“Eugenics is the applied science of the bio-social movement which advocates practices to improve the genetic composition of a population, usually a human population. It is a social philosophy advocating the improvement of human hereditary traits through the promotion of higher reproduction of more desired people and traits, and reduced reproduction of less desired people and traits.” - (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics).

Such a plan is rooted in Evolution and is the knowledgeable foundation behind the Nazi movement, among others, that has led us to the endeavors of Trans-humanity. Such wickedness in its raw form, such as the Slaughter Houses of the Holocaust, is easy to recognize and reject after the fact, but when it masquerades in other forms it quickly becomes confusing:

HR 645 National Emergency Centers Establishment Act Sec.2.(4) informs us that along with three (3) previous specific purposes, the establishment of these centers are to be used also; “to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.” - (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr645/text).

So although that person today is Janet Napolitano, (herself extremely incompetent to the job as evidenced by her history on the job), what happens when another of Obama’s Muslim friends of the Muslim Brotherhood replaces her by appointment? What might he feel is appropriate use? Do you think I am being paranoid?

Arif Alikhan is presently the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security - (http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Arif_Alikhan):

“In June 2009, Obama appointed a Muslim, Kareem Shora, to the Homeland Security Advisory Council. Shora had been executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, a group that had generally opposed anti-terror efforts since 9/11 – as have all the Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups in the U.S. But more worrisome was Obama’s appointment of another Muslim, Arif Alikhan, to be Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security. Alikhan is affiliated with the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), which is another highly deceptive Brotherhood-linked group” - (http://frontpagemag.com/2011/jamie-glazov/the-muslim-brotherhood%E2%80%99s-penetration-of-the-obama-administration/).

Mohammad Elibiary is the Homeland Security Adviser. And has already proven his loyalties are not on behalf of the U.S. - (http://www.humanevents.com/2011/11/01/great-moderate-muslim-hope-mohamed-elibiary-leaks-intel-documents/):

“When Mohamed Elibiary was appointed earlier this year to the Department of Homeland Security’s newly-formed Countering Violent Extremism Working Group, it was done quietly and without fanfare. It’s hard to believe that this silence was accidental, considering Elibiary’s appearance at a conference honoring Ayatollah Khomeini, his attacks on prosecution of terrorist fundraisers, his active promotion of jihadist ideology godfather Sayyid Qutb, and the threat he made against a Dallas Morning News journalist who repeatedly exposed his extremist views. But none of that has stopped Mohamed Elibiary from promoting himself as a “de-radicalization” expert courted not only by Janet Napolitano and the Department of Homeland Security, but testifying before Congress earlier this year, giving briefings to the Congressional Research Service, and being hailed by the establishment media.” - excerpt of a very informative article: (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2010/10/18/Homeland-Security---s-Muslim-Advisor-Mohamed-Elibiary-Spoke-at-Conference-Honoring-Ayatollah-Khomeini).

So let’s just imagine that these men are not actually Muslim Brotherhood associates, it is still very much like appointing Japanese people to the National Defense cabinet during our WWII conflict with Japan, it wasn’t done then for this very reason! What could possibly be the national benefit that overshadows the substantial risk of enemy infiltration?

And as we see the Marxist Muslim sitting in the seat of the U.S. President, filling his circle with appointed (not elected) Muslims, we have to wonder if line (4) of the above HR645 in the hands of a Muslim loyalist would not be reminiscent of the legal Holocaust camps of Germany. Am I still being paranoid?

(*2b) The Six:
“The respected Egyptian magazine Rose al-Youssef has identified at least six Brotherhood-tied agents of influence who have worked into positions inside the Obama administration...

Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser.
Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference.
Salam al-Marayati – Obama Adviser, founder of Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current executive director.
Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar, Islamic Society of North America.
Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships” - (http://counterjihadreport.com/tag/arif-alikhan/).

(*3) Vampire Romances:
“The Twilight Saga: New Moon, commonly referred to as New Moon, is a 2009 American romantic vampire film based on Stephenie Meyer's 2006 novel New Moon. It is the second film in The Twilight Saga film series and is the sequel to 2008's Twilight.”

“Angel is an American television series, a spin-off from the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The series was created by Buffy's creator, Joss Whedon, in collaboration with David Greenwalt, and first aired on October 5, 1999.”

“The Vampire Diaries is a supernatural drama television series developed by Kevin Williamson and Julie Plec, loosely based on the book series of the same name written by L. J. Smith.” Etc. etc. - Various internet quotes of description.

We have arrived at the age where in the heightened lust of humanity our fair daughters (i.e. Americans) intentionally seek out as lovers, those whose very nature brings death… And they do it with intoxicating style! These are fair daughters indeed.
*