Continued

Post 026

This next example goes just a bit further. Intentional deception is carefully organized and presented with the natural tendencies of the human mind calculated in for the desired perception.
This is my favorite example of seeing but not seeing!
Basketball pass test
(http://michaelscomments.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/very-interesting-test-of-perception/)

Think how much more can be done with actual lies!

"Half truth is often a greater lie" - Benjamin Franklin "Poor Richard's Almanack" 1758

This next deception is getting a bit more complicated to explain in a short blog, the following video uses professional media, appealing sound effects, and a voice narration that is accepted as scientific fact. But listen for these two points:
First: The number of times the concept words; Maybe, Perhaps, Possibly, Probably are used in this so-called scientific presentation. And Second: The presentation is built on a disprovable theory as if it was long proven to be fact. That theory? Evolution.
Common, stay with me for a minuet. Don’t get so defensive yet. After I am done you can still reject my views.

Before you watch the video on the cell, let me ask you; If I found an 1847 US quarter in the desert where it would seem impossible that man has been, would you believe that quarter had evolved there over millions of years? Or would you try to come up with another theory of how that quarter got there?
The evolution of that quarter would not even enter the equation. Of course the quarter was made by someone, and the theories of how it got there would get as wild as perhaps a collector of rare coins had dropped it out of an airplane.
Why would you so completely reject the concept that the coin had evolved? The coin is nothing more than a collection of metals in a circular shape with images stamped on both sides. It does not move, it is extremely simplistic, much more likely to have evolved than a cell.
But when it comes to biology we are told a fantastic story that simply defies all scientific evidence and observations; “Biology HAS evolved.” they say.
Now the truly strange part is that the entire theory of evolution is not based on facts that can be perceived in two different ways like the spinning girl example, but rather based on intentional lies and deception.

I ask just one simple yet foundational question;
“Give me just one example in all the matter of the known universe, using the laws of science, of anything that gets better over time when left to itself.” All things we know of is in the state of decay. This is the nature of biology. Yet in the face of this irrefutable fact, we are to believe that man has evolved from the primordial goo after thousands and millions of individual successful accidental improvements. Scientists have tried a very simple experiment;

"Put a living cell in beaker with the perfect solution to sustain the cell's life, then poke a hole in the cell with a sterile needle. The parts of the cell leak out into the solution. Why does the cell die?" - Michael Behe "Unlocking The Mysteries Of Life".

All the parts of the cell are already there in the form needed for life, no evolution needed at this point, the solution is perfect for life, no evolution needed at this point either, yet the cell cannot be brought to life with help let alone on its own. Yet we are to assume that by undirected accident and millions of years, evolution brought about the living cell, and the living cell brought about the variety of species we see today. This idea can be described as nothing short of insanity. Honestly.
Now watch the following video while thinking about this.
Cell Biology Deception
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zufaN_aetZI&feature=channel)

I am using reason and logic, I openly seek anyone who can show how my thinking to this point is flawed.

Notice how I have not brought religion or God into this until now, yet those of you who still believe in evolution have already jumped ahead with great emotional stress, to point out how unbelievable is the notion of God as a creator.
Your case does not defend evolution, just rejects the alternative theory which I never brought up yet. How do I know this? Because there is no other answer. The coin evolved or it was made.
And this is the reason why the belief in evolution; the rejection of God as creator. Not the science that proves evolution.

The theory of evolution is a card trick, a misdirection, a poorly thought out deception which only takes a bit of thought to realize it for what it is.

How does this relate to my previous posts?
Small bits of documentation will never prove a point. They can only be used to support a view already accepted. There is a bigger picture that is in question. If you follow my posts they will eventually point to the real issue.
All I ask is that you use your own mind, Reject all you think you know and start at the basics again, openly examining each concept with a fresh mind of discovery.

If your conclusion turns out to be the same, then fine, you’ve lost nothing. But you may just find that what you thought you knew might be a slick deception that will take you to our national destruction first, and your personal destruction next.

"Truth never lost ground by inquiry, because she is most of all reasonable" - William Penn "More Fruits of Solitude" 1702.
* * * * * * *