What Is The Remedy?

Post 338

Since we are now more enlightened to the level of cancer already spread deep into all the primary regions of the United States’ body of governance, I ask you-- the god in Type of the United States of America; the sovereign people of this More Perfect Union of these fifty individual but united States;-- What is the remedy for a President that will not obey, let alone uphold, the very document that defines this nation’s DNA; the Constitution?
And while we are asking the question with Mr. Gowdy, let’s extend that question; What is the remedy for a Congress who refuses to do the same? How about for the Supreme Court who is enacting the third subversion in this Genetically Modified unholy trinity of corruption? How do we get them all to simultaneously do the job they swore an oath of allegiance to do but refuse to do?
While they seem to be incapable of working together to support and defend the Constitution, these three branches apparently have a natural propensity of contentiously uniting their individual rebellions to support the viral conquest by what appears to be Communism itself. What is the remedy?
As suggestively asked by Representative Gowdy-- apparently rhetorically, but in earnest;-- Is there an actual remedy of success that we can use other than to burn this nation down-- as recommended by; Saul Alinsky, The Communist Manifesto, The Islamic Mandate, and the plethora of US movies by their universal indoctrination of this specific propaganda into our subconscious minds on many simultaneous fronts regardless of age or gender? (*1).

It seems that we have come to the place where everyone wants to blame “the other guy” for failing to do, or for abusing, his duty in the effort to cover their own similar failures, but although more than eager to blame, they won’t actually punish that other guy by accountability, perhaps in fear that the accountability will return to them and punish them for their sins too. So again, as asked by Trey Gowdey-- a member of the Corrupt body of Congress-- I ask you; the We The People people: What is the Remedy at this point in the game? If you don’t know, how do you expect them to know; they were given their seats of offices from among you and by you!

Is it time to enact the U.S. Declaration-confirmed right of the people to “pull down the house of cards” (*2a)? Was that the intent of the Declaration’s inclusion of the republican concept? Is that what we want… to play into the destroying hands of the “Progressive Communists”? Has the Communist method shown a history of desirable outcomes…even after the collateral body-count of the innocent has been put out of sight-and-mind by a blanket of soil? Do we go ahead and “burn the system down” now?
Isn’t that a bit like committing suicide to avoid being murdered? Or killing the patient so that the cancer won’t?

The European Union faces just such a question in dealing with Greece, --but they have the added complexity of not being so holy united as the American form of government: (call it ‘joined by God’), but rather more like a fornicating relationship of two independents trying to live together in a “civil union:” (call it ‘joined by man’). This unholy relationship between the EU and Greece is even more like the Type of the Beast and the Whore we are still discussing, because this is the age that brings it about. It is quite a conundrum they find themselves in. I postulate that the reason is because this is "a woman’s world now," and the masculine EU has far too long not had the marital authority to hold feminine Greece accountable for her unrestrained spending habits with her magic credit card. Now that her card quit working she comes to the EU and bats her eyes requesting more. But the EU sees that there isn’t much more he can give without risking bankruptcy himself. She has got to change her ways if he is going to keep paying her bills. It is a law of nature that defies the redistribution of wealth concept.
So as Greece cries crocodile tears reminding him that “he loves her and needs her,” she implores; “Have some compassion, find your humanity!” in hopes that it will move him to yield his manly stand. She pulls the “Christian’s are supposed to forgive unconditionally” card, not understanding or caring that forgiveness is biblically contingent upon repentance. Setting aside the Law of God; the Law of Nature alone tells us that Greece must show a humble recognition of her crimes and a submissive willingness to be tightly governed to change her uncontrollable destructive ways or she will ruin him in the process of destroying herself. We might call this heightened level of governance; Rehab.
But clearly Greece has no such notion in mind and is indigent that such a suggestion would be made. So which of the two genders is actually destroying the house when a punishmentless remedy cannot be found but the punishment is not implemented?

“Every wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands” Proverbs 14:1.

It is hard not to see that throwing out the unrepentant whore would be the only right answer-- (A prostitute is a woman who does immoral deeds for money, while a whore is a woman who does her immoral deeds because she likes it. I intend Whore in this present use to describes one playing the part of the “wife” who works against her "not husband” by willingly taking up with other illicit “leaderships” for her pleasure, including her own willfulness justified by outside influence)--. The EU would survive such a decision to act decisively, though his world and that of the family would change. Man-up and deal with it while you can still survive it:

“Give not thy strength unto women, nor thy ways to that which destroyeth kings” Proverbs 31:3.

But since this is ‘a woman’s world now,’ even our masculine branches of authority have been trained to be emotional basket-cases led by the heart, and cannot bring themselves to do the right thing for fear of the consequences… or the public criticism of “heartless.” They have been convinced to think emotionally about such choices. The Bible words it like this:

“As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy path” Isaiah 3:12. (see also Jeremiah 50:37).

“The mighty men of Babylon have forborn to fight, they have remained in their holds: their might hath failed; they became as women; they have burned her dwellingplaces; her bars are broken” Jeremiah 51:30.

Remember, I am describing the troubled relationship between the masculine Beast Empire and the Whorish City of the Revelation 17 prophecy; a two-thousand year old prophecy that is quickly becoming hardly more than a description of current events even before the specific event described comes to pass.
But in the description we can use both elements of past and future to apply reason in the exploration of the other, and in our case the present that is between them. The prophecy enables us to see our own outcome if we follow that course, so while we perhaps don’t know the outcome of ‘the other’ course, we should calculate the odds that it would be better than the outcome we do know by the prophecy. The course of what America used to be-- while being clearly Christian, and unsavory by today’s Pagan culture and mindframe-- was nonetheless a beneficially successful course indeed. Show me a better.
And with the looming masculine governance of the Islamic Beast now raging through the Earth re-establishing his Empire of subjugating masculine nations into feminine slave wives, I’m not seeing the redeeming virtue in the prophetic Babylonian mindframe of thinking and acting like emotional women as a good general defense strategy.

I am actually very curious to see how this immediate problem with Greece plays out, because, while I know by prophecy that some surviving portion of the ancient Empire of Greece plays a very large role in the last end-times events (Daniel 8:19-23 among others), we don’t yet know just how the specifics bring it to pass. Frankly, even though I stand fully against the whole Christless EU governance of nations like a mullah over a harem of silly women, the general concept has merit, so I recommend that the EU drop Greece for the whore that she is and deal with the consequences that come. It’s the manly thing to do in the effort to save the rest of the house by establishing the authority of right thinking. But unfulfilled prophecy tends to suggest that the EU will yield again, and his troubles will continue to compound a while longer. Because this is the age of women.

What might be a significant undesirable event if Greece is forced to leave the EU by her unrepentant destructive ways? She may find herself in desperation taking up with the “the other guy;” China, Russia, or Islam, who would be happy to pay her bills without condition to get her into bed, and such an event would be one very sound way of seeing the last-times prophecy regarding Greece come to pass.
Do I care that seeing her depart from the EU might bring this about? Not where it concerns doing the right thing. Greece must not be allowed to continue in her stubborn unrepentance without punishment; it would teach all the other ladies to exploit the same weakness in the governor and perhaps fulfill the prophecy from the other side of the argument which makes the reason other than ‘doing the right thing’ a mute point. Do you not think God understood the repercussions of throwing Lucifer out of heaven? Yet he did it anyway. Lucifer showed a deadly nature that was unredeemable.
And in throwing him out, all of his angels went with him, to ‘win his rebel kingdom’ as Saul Alinsky puts it in admiration. So be it; What is that to keeping the power of the kingdom of heaven sound? Do I cry for the poor plight of Lucifer in his pitiful fallen condition? Not in the least; he made his choice. But that does not mean I take pleasure in or rejoice in his destruction; it just simply has nothing more to do with the inner-workings of the kingdom in which I have chosen. The repercussions are for God to deal with, though I may indeed suffer as a result of them when two kingdoms collide in battle. That is not my problem because its not in my jurisdiction to control; I’m just supposed to do the right thing, and the right thing as a man is to obey the rules of good governance. That includes letting Greece go for her stubborn willfulness that wants others to pay for her unrepentant crimes. Frankly, this feminine confusion of Greece while the EU tries hard to keep her anyway, is sounding a whole lot like modern Christianity today as unrepentence changes the whole theme of redemption (Deuteronomy 5:11 + Hebrews 6:4-6).
While you don’t yet know it, Unrepentent Redemption is the theme of the Antichrist Kingdom as the servant becomes the Lord, subverting all that he has and is. This concept is the foundational dividing line to the whole Grand Tapestry which we are exploring.

So now back to Christian America’s similar problem. Our manly Congress has let this undisciplined nature in our governing branches escalate into obviously unrecoverable levels of unrepentence, because even our Congress has been playing the man-whore along with his President, both of them encouraged by the wicked spirit of the Presidents’ Supreme Court. It’s a case of political hedonism.

Perhaps throwing in the towel is the only answer.

But I am reminded of God’s violent reaction to the similar hedonism going on at the foot of the Mountain of God (Exodus 32:10), and how Moses appealed to God for a stay of execution based upon the value of the relationship already invested (Exodus 32:11-14). I am also reminded of Jesus’ great sacrifice to redeem mankind from our iniquities by allowing us the opportunity to confess and repent without consequence to us, and suddenly I think that there is in fact another way.
But to be frank, I don’t think passing a law that grants the Judiciary the authority to convict the President for violating Congresses’ law, is going to have even the slightest impact. How could it? It’s the Executive Office that has the power to enforce the law… that they already don’t enforce. It’s like passing a new law to allow the judge to convict the corrupt police of breaking the law, and then expecting the corrupt police to enforce the law by arresting themselves because the judge told them to.
Nice try Trey, but all you have succeeded in doing is to surrender yet more of your Congressional manly power to the feminine spirit of the President who is already drunk with empowerment. I’m thinking we need another angle, and while your speech was pretty, your suggested bill really smacks of more-of-the-same insanity. I’m getting the growing impression that you are just showboating along with the rest; you’re just targeting the “other” audience for applause.
I’m not clapping.

But to be fair to his empty efforts, I have shown, even superficially, that it seems things have gotten so far out of control that our governing entities no longer have it within their wherewithal to fix this complex problem without bringing down the whole house of cards. So Mr. Gowdy plays the only card left in his loosing hand and silently prays for a miracle. Where do miracles come from? God.
Remember: To our government; We the People are that god. If the call has been even quietly made, what do we do?

Do you know any marriages like what I have described? Is there yet a remedy rather than a solution? In today’s ready willingness to throw in the towel, the divorce rate seems to tell us there is not. And the rest, in the turmoil of self-willed bitterness, are hardly worthy of calling marriage.
But I believe there is yet a remedy. It’s just not a remedy that would please the unrepentant people of Greece. It’s a remedy that requires a change of heart from what got them into this problem in the first place. America too, needs a change of heart to fix its problems, the question is; Does she want to?
* * *

So how do you change the heart of a nation?
To answer foundational questions like this we need to go to the source. What do the Scriptures tell us on the topic regarding our particular problem?
We know, as exampled by our Congressional perversions, that the masculine element of the Christian nation is making its own very destructive choices as the Constitutionally “god-ordained” rulers by law, both encourage depravity and restrain the honorable in the effort to fix the turmoil in his family. And we know as exampled by Islam, that the masculine element of the Demonic Empire is likewise making its own very destructive choices as the subverted Biblical Law is applied by a twisted mind for the same goal of domestic tranquility from the opposite angle. So we really need to be careful to examine the details for accuracy rather than go with the current ‘general idea’ while making our evaluations of the right authority to follow.
In the name of The People through the perversions of their Constitutional authority, Congress says: “Oh this is not good!” while it acts out the unspoken desire to “Let the wild Pony Run!”
In the name of God through the Koranic perversion of the biblical Mosaic Law, Islam says: “Burn it all down for their sins!” while they perform all manner of the most lewd crimes imaginable.
There are details in the Constitution, and in the Scripture of that Law, that provide a completely different motive and spirit which we will explore in the effort to fixing this unfixable problem with remedy rather than a solution.
Let’s have a look:

After Moses held back the Exodus 32:9-10 warranted and righteous “burn it down” wrath of God’s anger that had every justifiable reason to fall like a hammer, how was the problem of hedonism in God’s people dealt with? We simply read the rest of the passage to find out:
But let’s first do a short recap of Exodus 32 to identify how they got to the answer:

v.1-- opens with Moses-- Typing Christ-- departed to be with God, leaving God’s people to rule themselves in his absence. In the very same verse 1 we see that the people, having no shepherd, were incapable of self-governance and immediately turned to hedonism through v.6.

v.7-- reveals to us that God knew full well what was going on, and sent Moses-- still Typed as Christ-- down to the people in what we might Type as the ‘first coming,’ (which makes Moses’ first departure up to God (on the mountain) represent the severed relationship ‘absence of the Creator’ after the Creation and fall of Adam and Eve and their ejection from the ‘EU’ Garden).
[We get this concept of comparisons by seeing Moses leading the people from Egypt as the ‘Creation’ of a new nation representing humanity as Adam and Eve. If these Typology validating details are confusing just skip them for now to continue on to the point].

It is humorously noteworthy that in this “Authoritative directing verse” God identifies the people as belonging to Moses--i.e. Christ--: “Go take care of your people, they are making a mess of themselves.”
And so we see Christ came for his people, distinctly different from God the Father, as if each had different methods of dealing with humanity’s iniquities and sins. Yet here it is clear that God the Father did the sending for his own purposes of redemption…that requires repentance…which is promoted by the fear of consequences…before the consequences come.

Now AFTER God reveals that he knows full well what is going on, and sends Moses down to respond to the situation; THEN, in v.9, God begins his whole; “I’m so mad I’m going to wipe them out and start over,” declarations: i.e. “burn the system down,” -- as allowed by Type in the U.S. Declaration and justified by the nature of The People being the god-like maker of the institution that they intend to burn down for its lack of usefulness.
But if God really intended to destroy his people he wouldn’t have arranged for Moses to go deal with it before he started his tirade of “I am going to end this whole thing right now!” Therefore we can easily conclude that God was making a threat to use his destroying power in the effort to illicit a change before the power was actually used. Thus: a threat.

Islam says: “See? God’s way is to destroy it all for its sins.” Congress says: “See? God’s way is to make concessions (*3).” What do the Scriptures tell us is God’s actual way? Let’s look for it.

Being the manly man, God the ruler, the Law Maker; God needed to declare the Law of punishment, as well as the intent to applying the Law, to instill the fear of the frightening penalty for breach, BEFORE sending the alternate escape plan that would then be accepted eagerly to avoid the sure-coming penalty. Otherwise the people would not, nor could not, respect God and his laws that had no fear of being actually applied. Much like the acting President cannot respect Congress today: He simply has no fear of its power that he knows by experience it will not use.

“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding” Proverbs 9:10.

“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments…” Psalm 111:10.

“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction” Proverbs 1:7.

“And all Israel heard of the judgment which the king had judged; and they feared the king: for they saw that the wisdom of God was in him, to do judgment” I Kings 3:28.

Apparently missed by Mr. Gowdy: If God, or the king, or Congress in this case, does not DO judgment, then he CANNOT be respected. This is where we are today on so many levels it’s actually scary.
In Type of the Moses narrative, we can understand that Jesus came to “do his Moses best” to resolve the problem and keep God from destroying the earth in his wrath, because, make no mistake, God could make Jesus an entirely new earth with new people to call his own (Matthew 3:9). God is just mad enough to do it! It’s only God’s intended “Jesus appeal” for a stay of execution that holds it off:

…“Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground?
And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: and if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down” Luke 13:6.

So Moses, Typing Jesus, --at God’s own “hidden” design-- appeals to God for His own name’s sake-- not for the sake of humanity-- and says; “let me deal with this problem, I think we can work this out to a better remedy than extermination.”…

“And Moses turned, and went down from the mount, and the two tablets of the testimony were in his hand…” Exodus 32:15.

Ok, so here we are, asking ourselves the same question that Moses must have asked himself; “What do we do now?” It’s ours to do.

-- Now as a bit of a side-note to help us apply this narrative as an accurate Typology for our own situation. Lest you think that this event was the first giving of the law ‘before Christ came’, we back-track to chapter 20 where God gave Moses and the people the easily corruptible verbal law sometime back. So when Moses came down from the mountain with the tablets of the law “written in stone” it was an incorruptible clarification of what their sin had already corrupted… to the very edge of their own utter destruction. This “written in stone” coming down of Moses was the Type of God coming down “in the flesh” to clarify what had already been given but corrupted: Redemption.
So now we are Typing this ensample for our own edification, looking for the spirit of the events that we read. In this way we can easily see that Jesus came to earth, via his birth, with the established law in his hand to deal with a wayward people that God was about to destroy, but had sent his Son to resolve the fruitless-problem in his people if it could be done. The means of how this remedy is enacted is hidden in the above parable, which we will get to. Feel free to pause her, go back to the parable as I have copied it above, and figure it out for yourself. It will greatly enhance your wider wisdom more than if I just give it to you narrowly.

Congress, in dealing with the President, has the power of money (coercion) and the established Law (fear) in his hands as tools to resolve the unconstitutional waywardness of his spouse.
The EU, in dealing with Greece, also has the established power of Money and law in his hands; only the established capitalization of the means is reversed.
In either case the Authority has every right to cast them out with finality due to breach, but the threat of the power to do so only works when the threatened believes it will be used. Once the feared power of the threat is challenged and fails to act, the bluff is called and the fear is instantly gone, and with it, any remedy that the fear was to bring. The only avenue remaining is the actual sudden enactment of the power of punishment that has no purpose of remedy. It is Capitol Punishment; the means of eliminating the problem for the sake of the body. In this way we see that the threat of destruction was the last tool of redemption before sudden destruction that needs no warning falls. Enacting the actual power is not redeeming; it is resolving.
But God’s threat of utter destruction was not hollow; the alternate offer sent after the threat has not abrogated the actual destruction threatened; it just postponed it if the alternate is not accepted:

“… and if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down”

Yet oddly enough, like the EU, and like Congress, God seemed to miss the needful fulfillment of the punishment when the threat was called a bluff… on numerous occasions, in their wilderness adventure through rehab. And the result was that the people lost their fear of God (II Peter 3:9-10).
NOW we have a real remedy-less mess in trying to threaten them further, very much described in Greece’s disdainful response to her creditors who keep telling her; “Not another dime!” yet they continue to cave at the last minute because she refuses to change, but promises that she is trying.

NOW we pick up at v.v.17-20 of chapter 32 of Exodus:
Moses comes into camp and gets an eyeful of what is actually going on (compare with Genesis 18:20-21).
And boy was he mad at what he sees!
Humble Moses was so angry at what he saw taking place among his people that he broke the tablets that were in his hands. In Type, by our childhood image of gentle Jesus, we fail to recognize Jesus being angry with his people in the narrative of the Gospels. This is because he contained himself very admirably in the effort to reach his people’s heart in this "last-ditch effort" to save them, yet John the Baptist suggested a warning of urgent repentance needed to prepare the way of the Lord, which should have told us there was wrath afoot in the kingdom nearby:

"In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, and saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" Matthew 3:1.

If we contemplate it, we know that Jesus came and effectively destroyed the law by providing another violent way, but just breaking the written tablets does not repeal the law that was already given verbally before it was written in stone:

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill (by his own death to pay our debt of breaking the law)” Matthew 5:17.

Now we can see that upon coming into the world, Jesus saw the decayed condition and immediately determined that clarification of the law was not going to fix this problem at this point in time (age), because in truth, the law would require the death of everyone for their existing guilt (Romans 3:10) and bring about the extermination that God’s wrath was want to do. So he cast the tablets down in the design of a better remedy (Hebrews 7:19) to provide a way for the people to have hope of escaping their own deserved destruction. The crime has already been committed, the judgment already determined: “What is to be done now but suffer the deserved consequences?” This hopeless condemned mentality that does not deny the guilt, is not conducive to producing an effort to change, i.e. repent. Moses, and Jesus, came down to make a change; a change that would produce fruit and alter the destructive intent of the vineyard owner.
Let’s go back now to the text to see how this remedy towards motivating a change played out, in the effort to apply it to our own present desperate needs:

I leave you here with only six stars to contemplate this on your own, while knowing that there is a seventh-star Post still coming to complete the thought.
* * * * * *

(*1) “Burn The System Down!”; a very consistent push by the now recognizable spirit of the Destroyer in numerous patterns and promoters:

Rules for Radicals:
Sometimes you have to burn the system down in order to rebuild it - (a concept from Rules For Radicals p.xiii) “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. ‘The Prince’ was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold Power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away” (Rules for Radicals, opening paragraph). A book and ideology honoring, and mirroring the nature of the god of Deceit and Destruction:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins-- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom --Lucifer.” Signed: --SAUL ALINSKY. - Rules for Radicals, dedication page.

Mr. Alinsky is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. “In 1969, while a political science major at Wellesley College, Hillary Rodham Clinton chose to write her senior thesis on Alinsky’s work, with Alinsky himself contributing his own time to help her.” - Citation: Cockburn, Alexander; St. Clair, Jeffrey (April 13, 2015). “The Making of Hillary Clinton”. CounterPunch. Retrieved by Wikipedia.org April 12, 2015.

Clearly there is strong evidence that the Highest leaders of our Government are now significantly influenced by those who’s heroes are openly Satan himself. Yet this is not alarming to anyone but “an alarmist”. Am I wasting my breath? No:

“When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered they soul” Ezekiel 3:18-19.

The Communist Manifesto:
“The history of all hitherto existing society is a history of class struggles. …a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Communist Manifesto, opening paragraph)… “What the bourgeoisie therefore produce, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” (the last paragraph of the same opening chapter). “In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things. …The Communists’…ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions” - The last page of The Communist Manifesto, 1948 by International Publishers Co, Inc., 2014 printing, bold type added.

The Foundational Islamic Doctrine:
While many “moderate” Muslims like to explain that true Islam does not condone such violence, the very founder and demi-god-like prophet Mohamed-- that Muslims are supposed to venerate, imitate, and obey-- conducted his life and motives in just such a way and wrote their Holy Doctrines to require it. As I understand it; their books teach that their Messiah cannot come until they have covered the earth in blood via a Holy War.

“Growing up as a Palestinian, I was never once taught that Jihad was anything other than one of Islam’s most foundational tenants. Jihad was always taught as a war against the entire non-Muslim world. Islam, Allah, and Jihad are inseparable” - Walid Shoebat, God’s War On Terror, p.105.

“Unless we go forth, (for Jihad) He (Allah) will punish us with a grievous penalty, and put others in our place” - Qur’an Sura 9:39.

“And he orders us to fight them on until there is no more tumult and faith in Allah is practiced everywhere” - Qur’an Sura 8:39., etc., etc., etc.

Movie Mentality:
While it may seem morally acceptable to use Zombies as the imaginary justification to kill thousands without hesitation or remorse, the psychology that comes with it is as godlessly Islamic as can be imagined. You don’t think that Islamists see any non-Islamist as “zombies”? Were Jews seen as human in the Holocaust, or just the walking dead that had not yet been put down? How do you suppose people come to these justifications?
It comes by Godless indoctrination that puts a flavor of righteous, and even moral responsibility over the heinous deed of lust and thrill. Gang-rape a virgin and then try her in court as a whore that violated the religion so sexually virtuous that it dresses its women is bed-sheets to hide them from the insatiable lust of the holy men of the religion? What can be said that is not redundant to the evidence of insanity in the name of righteousness?
This is a growing worldview on many fronts that promotes taking the extreme law into your own psyco hands, such as we saw in the series 24 among countless others: “Hey, we’re only killing bad guys here.” Watch for it; it’s in nearly every guy flick today. The ends justify the means; law just gets in the way of doing what needs to be done. And we feel righteous for doing it.
That’s the masculine side.
For a feminine account, please review Post 271 “The Violence of Peace” (http://when-did-reason-die.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-violence-of-peace.html).

(*2)(a) “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…(very important elements I left out to streamline the point)… That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness” - The U.S. Declaration of Independence.

…“Though I trust the friends of the proposed Constitution will never concur with its enemies in questioning the fundamental principle of republican government which admits the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution whenever they find it inconsistent with their happiness;

(*2)(b) yet it is not to be inferred from this principle that the representatives of the people, whenever a momentary inclination happens to lay hold of a majority of their constituents incompatible with the provisions in the existing Constitution would, on that account, be justifiable in a violation of those provisions; or that the courts would be under a greater obligation to connive at infractions in this shape than when they had proceeded wholly from the cabals of the representative body.
Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it prior to such and act.”… - The Federalist Papers No. 78, bold type added.

(*3) Concession: 1. Act of conceding or yielding.2. The admitting of a point claimed in argument.3. A thing yielded; an acknowledgment.4. A grant by a government of land, or property for some specified purpose. - Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 5th Edition, 1948.
*